Prior Art & Novelty Search
Research for patentability, novelty and non-obviousness questions across patent literature, technical publications and difficult-to-index sources.
3AIP supports the full research lifecycle—from deciding whether an invention is new to clearing a launch, challenging a patent, understanding a portfolio or developing evidence for licensing. Every matter is scoped around the decision the work must support.
Commission a focused search or connect several workstreams around a portfolio, product or dispute. The scope changes; the ownership standard does not.
Research for patentability, novelty and non-obviousness questions across patent literature, technical publications and difficult-to-index sources.
Market-entry analysis focused on enforceable claims in the jurisdictions where a product will be made, sold or used.
Priority-date research built around the asserted claims, with evidence from patents, standards, proceedings and non-patent literature.
Commercial-product and standards research that connects portfolio claims to observable features, implementations and technical evidence.
Structured intelligence for understanding filing activity, technical clusters, competitor positions and areas with room to operate or invest.
Clear, reviewable claim charts prepared for licensing analysis, assertion review, diligence and portfolio prioritisation.
Search and analysis supporting office-action response, continuation strategy, examiner-citation review and claim amendment decisions.
Technical drawing sets prepared in coordination with prosecution teams and adapted to formal requirements across filing jurisdictions.
Send us the citations, findings or report produced by your AI tool. We independently assess what is reliable, what is weak and what relevant coverage appears to be missing.
Validation is the broader assessment of quality, reliability and completeness. Source verification is one of the checks we perform within it.
Share the citations, search results, analysis or report produced by the AI tool you used.
Our analysts explain what is well supported, what is weak or incorrect, and what relevant sources or search coverage are missing.
Use the validation report as a second opinion, or ask 3AIP to conduct a comprehensive manual search on the same matter.
If you proceed with a comprehensive manual search by 3AIP on the same matter, the AI Output Validation fee you have already paid is credited in full against the total cost of that search.
Monetisation work succeeds when technical evidence, claim interpretation and commercial focus reinforce one another. We help teams identify where to look, develop the factual record and compare opportunities before resources are committed to negotiation or enforcement.
Identify products, platforms and standards whose observable operation merits deeper claim-level review.
Collect reliable technical material from manuals, specifications, standards, testing records and public product documentation.
Connect each material claim limitation to evidence, separate strong reads from assumptions and document unresolved gaps.
Compare evidence strength across patents and targets so attention is directed to the opportunities with the clearest factual basis.
Patent databases are only one layer. We extend the search into standards, academic literature, product documentation, archived material and prosecution records.
A source matters only when it answers the claim or commercial question. Analysts read the technology, context and timing—not just keywords.
Queries, source dates, evidence decisions and claim mappings are captured so counsel can review how the conclusion was reached.
Every report is designed around how the work will be reviewed and used—not around the volume of results collected.
The claim set, market, jurisdiction, priority date and intended use of the work are agreed before research begins.
A named analyst builds and adapts the search plan as evidence changes the direction of inquiry.
Potential findings are tested against the claims, technology and legal purpose rather than passed through as raw results.
The final record explains what was found, why it matters, where uncertainty remains and who stands behind the analysis.
Select the example closest to your matter. Your email will open with the report name and request details already completed.
Prior-art ranking, novelty assessment and claim-focused analyst opinion.
Download sample (PDF)Live-claim review, jurisdiction risk matrix and design-around observations.
Download sample (PDF)Priority-date evidence, element mapping and documented invalidity rationale.
Download sample (PDF)Product evidence mapped to claim elements with traceable supporting sources.
Download sample (PDF)Portfolio segmentation, filing trends, competitor positions and open territory.
Download sample (PDF)Use-ready claim mapping for licensing review and target prioritisation.
Download sample (PDF)A coordinated drawing set prepared around formal filing requirements.
Download sample (PDF)Examiner-citation review, supplemental research and prosecution support analysis.
Download sample (PDF)Independent assessment of client-supplied AI results: what is reliable, what is weak and what is missing.
Download sample (PDF)A 20-minute call is usually enough to define the question, intended use, jurisdictions, evidence threshold and most efficient research plan.