Patent research, evidence and analysis

Research built for the next IP decision.

3AIP supports the full research lifecycle—from deciding whether an invention is new to clearing a launch, challenging a patent, understanding a portfolio or developing evidence for licensing. Every matter is scoped around the decision the work must support.

Abstract geometric forms representing connected patent assets
One research partner
Protection to
commercial use
Prior art  ·  FTO  ·  Invalidity  ·  Evidence of use  ·  Landscape  ·  Claim charts  ·  Prosecution  ·  Illustration  ·  AI validation
01Across the IP lifecycle

Nine connected research services. One accountable methodology.

Commission a focused search or connect several workstreams around a portfolio, product or dispute. The scope changes; the ownership standard does not.

Protect01

Prior Art & Novelty Search

Research for patentability, novelty and non-obviousness questions across patent literature, technical publications and difficult-to-index sources.

Typical turnaround: 3–4 business days (standard); expedited available.
Ranked prior art · novelty analysis · written opinion
Clear02

Freedom-to-Operate & Clearance

Market-entry analysis focused on enforceable claims in the jurisdictions where a product will be made, sold or used.

Typical turnaround: 6–8 business days depending on scope.
Live-claim review · risk matrix · design-around observations
Challenge03

Invalidity & Validity Research

Priority-date research built around the asserted claims, with evidence from patents, standards, proceedings and non-patent literature.

Typical turnaround: 7–12 business days per claim set.
Element mapping · source record · invalidity rationale
Monetise04

Evidence-of-Use Analysis

Commercial-product and standards research that connects portfolio claims to observable features, implementations and technical evidence.

Typical turnaround: Scoped per engagement.
Product evidence · claim mapping · source citations
Position05

Patent Landscape & White Space

Structured intelligence for understanding filing activity, technical clusters, competitor positions and areas with room to operate or invest.

Typical turnaround: Scoped per engagement.
Taxonomy · portfolio segmentation · opportunity map
Use06

Claim Charts & Licensing Support

Clear, reviewable claim charts prepared for licensing analysis, assertion review, diligence and portfolio prioritisation.

Typical turnaround: Scoped per engagement.
Claim chart · evidence index · analyst observations
Advance07

Patent Prosecution Support

Search and analysis supporting office-action response, continuation strategy, examiner-citation review and claim amendment decisions.

Typical turnaround: 3–7 business days.
Citation analysis · supplemental search · prosecution brief
File08

Patent Illustration

Technical drawing sets prepared in coordination with prosecution teams and adapted to formal requirements across filing jurisdictions.

Typical turnaround: Scoped per engagement.
Formal figures · consistency review · filing-ready set
Validate09

AI Output Validation

Send us the citations, findings or report produced by your AI tool. We independently assess what is reliable, what is weak and what relevant coverage appears to be missing.

Typical turnaround: 3–5 business days for standard scope.
Source verification · quality assessment · gap analysis
AI Output Validation

Know how much of the AI output you can rely on.

Validation is the broader assessment of quality, reliability and completeness. Source verification is one of the checks we perform within it.

01 · You provide

Share the citations, search results, analysis or report produced by the AI tool you used.

02 · We assess

Our analysts explain what is well supported, what is weak or incorrect, and what relevant sources or search coverage are missing.

03 · You decide

Use the validation report as a second opinion, or ask 3AIP to conduct a comprehensive manual search on the same matter.

No duplicated fee

If you proceed with a comprehensive manual search by 3AIP on the same matter, the AI Output Validation fee you have already paid is credited in full against the total cost of that search.

Abstract blue and gold structure representing portfolio value
02Research for portfolio value

From a portfolio claim to commercially useful evidence.

Monetisation work succeeds when technical evidence, claim interpretation and commercial focus reinforce one another. We help teams identify where to look, develop the factual record and compare opportunities before resources are committed to negotiation or enforcement.

01

Target discovery

Identify products, platforms and standards whose observable operation merits deeper claim-level review.

02

Evidence development

Collect reliable technical material from manuals, specifications, standards, testing records and public product documentation.

03

Claim-to-product analysis

Connect each material claim limitation to evidence, separate strong reads from assumptions and document unresolved gaps.

04

Portfolio prioritisation

Compare evidence strength across patents and targets so attention is directed to the opportunities with the clearest factual basis.

03What strengthens the work

Research depth that goes beyond a database result.

Source breadth

Patent databases are only one layer. We extend the search into standards, academic literature, product documentation, archived material and prosecution records.

Technical interpretation

A source matters only when it answers the claim or commercial question. Analysts read the technology, context and timing—not just keywords.

Use-ready documentation

Queries, source dates, evidence decisions and claim mappings are captured so counsel can review how the conclusion was reached.

04Inside the deliverable

A clear record from question to conclusion.

Every report is designed around how the work will be reviewed and used—not around the volume of results collected.

01

Question defined

The claim set, market, jurisdiction, priority date and intended use of the work are agreed before research begins.

02

Research directed

A named analyst builds and adapts the search plan as evidence changes the direction of inquiry.

03

Evidence assessed

Potential findings are tested against the claims, technology and legal purpose rather than passed through as raw results.

04

Report issued

The final record explains what was found, why it matters, where uncertainty remains and who stands behind the analysis.

05Sample reports

See the standard of the deliverable.

Select the example closest to your matter. Your email will open with the report name and request details already completed.

01Medical Devices

Patentability & Novelty Search

Prior-art ranking, novelty assessment and claim-focused analyst opinion.

Download sample (PDF)
02Mechanical Systems

Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

Live-claim review, jurisdiction risk matrix and design-around observations.

Download sample (PDF)
03NLP / Software

Invalidity Search

Priority-date evidence, element mapping and documented invalidity rationale.

Download sample (PDF)
04Connected Products

Evidence-of-Use Claim Chart

Product evidence mapped to claim elements with traceable supporting sources.

Download sample (PDF)
05Battery Technology

Patent Landscape & White Space

Portfolio segmentation, filing trends, competitor positions and open territory.

Download sample (PDF)
06CMOS / Semiconductors

Licensing Claim Chart

Use-ready claim mapping for licensing review and target prioritisation.

Download sample (PDF)
07Mechanical Assembly

Patent Illustration Set

A coordinated drawing set prepared around formal filing requirements.

Download sample (PDF)
08Electronics

Prosecution Search

Examiner-citation review, supplemental research and prosecution support analysis.

Download sample (PDF)
09Multi-Jurisdiction Prior Art

AI Output Validation

Independent assessment of client-supplied AI results: what is reliable, what is weak and what is missing.

Download sample (PDF)
Scope the right research

Start with the decision, not a standard package.

A 20-minute call is usually enough to define the question, intended use, jurisdictions, evidence threshold and most efficient research plan.